Zum Hauptinhalt springen

WTC e.XTRA - Why did the World Trade Center Collapse?

Verfasst von: Tim Wilkinson, Lecturer in Civil Engineering
Veröffentlicht am: 23. Sep. 2001
Kategorie:

# 24.09.2001

This is an initial suggestion on one possible reason for failure, and should not be regarded as official advice

Fire-caused heat heavily affects material

The World Trade Center in Nw York was attacked and destroyed on the 11th of September in 2001. Foto: The University of Sydney Australia
The World Trade Center in Nw York was attacked and destroyed on the 11th of September in 2001. Foto: The University of Sydney Australia

The structural integrity of the World Trade Center depends on the closely spaced columns around the perimeter. Lightweight steel trusses span between the central elevator core and the perimeter columns on each floor.

These trusses support the concrete slab of each floor and tie the perimeter columns to the core, preventing the columns from buckling outwards. After the initial plane impacts, it appeared to most observers that the structure had been severely damaged, but not necessarily fatally.

It appears likely that the impact of the plane crash destroyed a significant number of perimeter columns on several floors of the building, severely weakening the entire system. Initially this was not enough to cause collapse.

However, as fire raged in the upper floors, the heat would have been gradually affecting the behaviour of the remaining material. As the planes had only recently taken off, the fire would have been initially fuelled by large volumes of jet fuel, creating potentially enormously high temperatures.


Blaze in highly confined area generated severe fire conditions

The strength of the steel drops markedly with prolonged exposure to fire, while the elastic modulus of the steel reduces (stiffness drops), increasing deflections.

Modern structures are designed to resist fire for a specific length of time. Safety features such as fire retarding materials and sprinkler systems help to contain fires, help extinguish flames, or prevent steel from being exposed to excessively high temperatures. This gives occupants time to escape and allow fire fighters to extinguish blazes, before the building is catastrophically damaged.

It is possible that the blaze, started by jet fuel and then engulfing the contents of the offices, in a highly confined area, generated fire conditions significantly more severe than those anticipated in a typical office fire. These conditins may have overcome the building´s fire defences considerably faster than expected.


Failure of entire structure due to mass of falling floors

Eventually, the loss of strength and stiffness of the materials resulting from the fire, combined with the initial impact damage, would have caused a failure of the truss system supporting a floor, or the remaining perimeter columns, or even the internal core, or some combination. Failure of the flooring system would have subsequently allowed the perimeter columns to buckle outwards.

Regardless of which of these possibilities actually occurred, it would have resulted in the complete collapse of at least one complete storey at the level of impact. Once one storey collapsed all floors above would have begun to fall. The huge mass of falling structure would gain momentum, crushing the structurally intact floors below, resulting in catastrophic failure of the entire structure.


Shockwave faster than falling structure

It is evident that the building is falling over to the left. The North Tower collapsed directly downwards, on top of itself. The same mechanism of failure, the combination of impact and subsequent fire damage, is the likely cause of failure of both towers. However, it is possible that a storey on only one side of the South Tower initially collapsed, resulting in the "skewed" failure of the entire tower.



QUELLEN UND VERWEISE:

The University of Sydney Australia